I’VE SAID it before, and I’ll say it again. I detest unnecessary roundabouts. And I detest the excessive clutter of traffic lights that blight our highways. However, more than anything else I despise the ludicrous combination of traffic lights ON roundabouts.

You could be forgiven for thinking that the plans for some of the roundabouts in my hometown of Livingston were drawn up by a committee of toddlers on a sugar-high with only a stack of cheap paper and a few coloured crayons to keep them busy. What other possible explanation could there be            for the directional marking being laid out in such a way that you are expected to break with all the learned knowledge of the Highway Code?

(Note to all highway planners: Just in case you don’t know, a roundabout should be treated as a crossroad. If you are turning left or going straight ahead – queue in the left hand lane. If you are turning right on the roundabout – queue in the right hand lane. What could be simpler? And, yes, I DO know about the 12 O’clock rule.)

However, in their infinite wisdom, our Plonker Planners have decided to change some of those rules in Livingston. And they have given the driver this crucial information by – wait for it – painting the directional arrows on the road!


Road markings that defy the Highway Code

One of the roundabouts where the road markings defy the Highway Code

Can anybody else recognise the sheer lunacy in this? Yes, that’s right. If there are cars waiting to enter the roundabout then you can’t see these arrows because the lead vehicles are parked on top of them. Additionally, though I understand changes are planned to be made, there is even a roundabout where the direction signs and the lane markings are at odds with each other. Brilliant! Or perhaps not.

(According to Oor Cooncil’s own web site, this means that “…drivers are having to change lanes sharply when they hit the hatches.) Yeah, or clobber another vehicle.

And how, pray tell me, could these shadowy geniuses of design and traffic management presume that we, as car drivers, are so darned THICK that we actually need a series of stop-go traffic lights on roundabouts? Apart from anything else, the result is that an arthritic granny on a Space Hopper could make it through parts of Livingston in less time than a boy racer in his Subaru.

Can you imagine the meeting where they came up with this plan?

“Okay, gentlemen, we need to find a way of creating effective road-confusion.”

“We could release flocks of geese and a herd of goats at every junction, Sir?”

“Hmm – I’m looking for something a little less restrained than that.”

“Traffic cones, Sir. Lots and lots of traffic cones… for no reason.”

“Nah, we’re already doing that.”

“Got it, Sir! We change the rules of the Highway Code, and we only let the vehicles at the front of the queue know the plan for negotiating the roundabout safely. Then, as they swerve into the correct lane, we give them the fright of their life by presenting them with a wall of vehicles parked at a red traffic light!”

“Brilliant, Smithers… or whatever your name is. You’ve got a bright future in this council, young man.”

Now, maybe it’s just me, but I’m certain that the purpose of a roundabout is to keep traffic flowing freely. So, answer me this: how can planting a forest of traffic lights on a roundabout help achieve that aim?

Note to all those dumb highway planners: IT CAN’T!

Maybe the time has come for drivers to adhere to the rules as laid out in the Highway Code. We could also uproot every set of superfluous traffic lights which we KNOW are slowing our journey to crawl pace, creating queues, increasing pollution and burning precious fuel.

Or we could round up the halfwits who so carefully planned all this confusion, and handcuff them to their own traffic lights. We then plant them in the middle of the roundabouts and pelt them with vegetables as we gleefully speed past.

I’m willing to wager that they wouldn’t be too long in coming up with a better – and simpler – design solution.

Drew McAdam



  1. Big Davie says:

    Doughnuts all of them!!!!

  2. Brian Morrison says:

    I do agree with your ‘lunacy’ theory, Drew, but one good thing about the situation in the picture above. It deters the boy racers from using the roundabout as an overtaking lane when they simply must pass you.

  3. Louise Rawlings says:

    I agree Drew, as you know the job I do, these monstrosities of lights at roundabouts and directional approaches to roundabouts as shown above are a joke and make my job much harder, but also interesting to watch the confusion. The best enjoyment I have had this year “other than watching Todd Carty on Ice” is watching drivers approach the Morrison roundabout when the lights are out. People are being so conditioned to the lights now they forget that when the lights are out it becomes JUST ANOTHER ROUNDABOUT.

  4. Richard Hortin says:


    your comments are spot on, as usual. I had to negotiate the roundabout shown in the picture, as part of my driving istructor training, and as per MY knowledge, approached in the left lane to proceed straight ahead, second exit. Only on final approach are the markings visible, necessitating a last minute lane change, or as I did, an entry onto the roundabout in the ” wrong lane”.

    On a similar note, slightly further along that same road, the unrestricted dual carriageway, with a 70 limit turned into a 30mph limit with minimal warning, earning me two black marks in a mile or so.

    I note this has now been amended, to a 50mph limit, which appears FAR more sensible, but I wonder how many unsuspecting motorists fell foul of a 40mph reduction in speed limit with hardly any warning?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: